It is being faced with a dire event we cannot prepare for, and under these conditions are confronted with the oblivious facet of our being. In those moments nothing else matters – norms and conscience fade away – and we focus on the outcome with primal intensity. It generally entails self preservation, but can also compel the surrendering of our lives – the ultimate sacrifice.
The characters in Residues find themselves in such circumstances. It is about doing the right thing and instinctively sensing the difference. Residues is a glimpse of us.
Back cover blurb
“Currency is a mechanism that acquires its value only once it can purchase what we want or need,” Grant Sandham told someone once.
He should know. His affluence has yielded little joy, and now cannot overturn his terminal illness.
He meets his soul mate during his final days, but is obligated to walk away – into the arms of a scarred New York City detective whose vigilante activities draw him into a dangerous world. He can save her, but the CIA has other designs.
Determined to dispose of his wealth before his passing, Grant sets up a benevolent fund. He could not have foreseen it enabling a young scientist to unleash a perilous technology that will benefit humankind – or destroy it.
It’s destiny – perhaps justice – when a vanishing speculum holds the key to life and death while uncovering a heartrending family tragedy.
Confronted with godlike decisions, Grant finds closure and a new dawn on the horizon of his heart.
It should have come sooner.
An important consideration when writing Residues was the juxtaposition of the issues; the sensitive and charged topics of euthanasia, abortion, morals, and ethics, in contrast to other elements in the novel. These were to be the backdrop against which the characters would play their roles, and gave rise to the dilemma; how deep do I delve into these issues without turning the novel into a soapbox, against; how lightly do I brush over them without negating their significance?
This became a balancing act, as woven into this delicate fabric were also moments of levity. I wasn’t sure if I should cull the humor or downplay the setting. Life is a series of spikes and troughs; sometimes we cry, other times we laugh – we truly are products of our environment, and I decided to present the novel I believed would stay true to life.
Ultimately, a fiction novel should have entertainment merit. If you’re asking how euthanasia can be considered entertainment, I believe you’ve grasped the challenge. Residues is not about euthanasia, but rather about people confronted by it – among other ethical and moral quandaries. Can cannibalism be considered entertainment? Not directly I suppose, unless it was the setting to reflect on the bizarre nature of the human condition – as in; The Silence of the Lambs. (Just to be clear; there’s no Hannibal Lector in Residues.) Similarly, the tale of Sweeney Todd comes to mind; a barber who kills his clients with a straight razor, then hands over their corpses to his partner in crime who bakes their flesh into meat pies. It has been adapted into a musical and a ballet…
Euthanasia is not the only issue confronting the characters; narcotics and scientific research further challenge their moral or ethical judgment – within the realm of the Doctrine of Double Effect – a set of ethical criteria.



