The first thing that jumped out at me was my delicious grammar. It was adequate but not on a commercial level; professional editors had set the bar high. However, I was fortunate to recognize the shortcoming. I spent many hours going to ‘grammar school’ on the Internet. This wasn’t fun, but a prerequisite for the craft, so I learned as much as I could in the shortest possible period. I thought I could pick out the grammar parts I needed, only to discover I needed it all.
That put a damper on things for a while; especially that grammar was but one of many new skills I’d need to hone. Then I discovered grammar checking programs. I rejoiced, thinking my slog was over, only to discover how ineffective they really were. The English language is more complex than many imagine; that’s why an English major will spend a few years at college to master his mother tongue, and no grammar checking program can match that.
So, while I was coming to terms with lie, lay, laid, lain, laying, lying, and lied, I took a look at how successful authors wrote. Of course, each had their own voice and style, but I got the gist of it, and found the secret sauce – simplicity. They all wrote in plain English. But there were still other mountains to climb.
Writing technically correct English was no guarantee for a compelling read. Back to the Internet; what constitutes good writing? There was a myriad, no, there was an avalanche, no, not right either; there were – to loan from Carl Sagan – billions and billions of articles and courses on the subject of writing a novel. Some even guaranteed to show how to write an award-winning, best-selling novel. I was back in business, but not for long.
I realized I’d need billions and billions of hours reading through them all. And not just that, I’d need to part with a small fee to gain access to this powerful knowledge. I soon discovered they all said the same thing in different ways, and it came down to a ‘paint-by-numbers’ scenario; trying to emulate the dissected work of successful authors. I understand there is some value in that, but it’s only a map of another writer’s journey. Creating your own map is something else.
I’ve similarly seen articles and books on how to write a hit song. It went something along these lines; (1) come up with an infectious beat. (2) add a catchy melody. (3) write some lyrics people will remember, and make sure to repeat them often throughout the song – especially in the chorus. It’s perfectly alright to only have ‘I love you madly’ repeated a few times over in the chorus. (4) adopt a pop structure – four lines in the first verse, then four lines in the second verse, if you don’t have a bridge, then go straight to the chorus. (5) repeat first verse (6) repeat chorus x 2
At this point I had not stopped writing, and knew I’d have to return to clean up the mess. I then stumbled upon an old article by Stephen King, and that set me on my way. I want to thank him for that, but the true credit should go to his teacher who taught him the lesson. He told how he, as a sophomore, had written an article about his school’s basketball team, and how the teacher corrected it. It opened his eyes, as it did mine. I was on my way again, and now had a clear way of weighing my writing. True, it was not foolproof, but I had something to shoot for.
What about the art of storytelling? Back to the Internet. I watched a video of a storytelling expert who had analyzed many popular stories and showed how they all had a similar thread. I couldn’t argue with that. Another video showed a man draw a graph to illustrate the same thing. I couldn’t argue with that either. Sadly, I was so far into my own story and had come across this information too late; unless I wanted to start over. This was a tough decision.
To continue with my marathon analogy; I could see the finishing line, my muscles ached, and I was dehydrated. The thought of returning to the starting line was a bridge too far, so I reevaluated what I had. Required: one flawed protagonist (check); protagonist hits bottom (check); protagonist’s internal and external conflict (check) ; love interest (check) ; antagonist adds to protagonist’s woes (antagonist should be appearing any day now) ; protagonist overcomes challenges (working on that, but seems unlikely) ; happy ending – all is resolved (not so sure – may have made the hurdles too high)
Overall I had the pieces of the puzzle – they were just not elegantly arranged as others have suggested, but I felt a reader would not have trouble following the thread, and in a way made the unfolding of the yarn less predictable. I went with that. With the word processor out of the way, other headaches arose.
I’ll spare you the details, but after much sweat I could help myself with CSS and HTML so that I could format the manuscript into an eBook. I saw the many complaints from readers expressing their dissatisfaction with poor formatting. (It’s real easy to make a shoddy eBook) I had put in too much effort to have this trip me up, and aimed to produce a technically acceptable eBook. Required : ensure Table of Contents is inserted and linked properly, (check), design a gripping cover (che… ) Then, the last hurdle – this website.
It’s a failing that I believe I can do anything, and without any experience, set off creating a website for Residues. Only halfway through did it occur to me to take a look at other author websites. I decided to stick with what I had knowing it was a risk in that it was unconventional. However, I (mostly) had a good time building it, and trust I have incorporated a user-friendly experience.



